CPU cooling is a complex task that can be difficult to approach, but it’s important at all costs. No matter if you are overclocking or just buying your first PC, these three coolers are the best of the best for any i5 system.
Whether you’re overclocking your processor, building a new PC or just looking for something to cool down the hottest parts of your build, checking out our top three picks will show you what’s hot and trending in today’s market.Today, hardware is more compact than ever before. Heat management has become a key component of performance optimization for desktop users. The three best CPU coolers are the Cooler Master Storm Sniper A510, Noctua NH-D15S and Scythe Mugen 4
The “best cpu cooler for i5-10600k” is a question that has been asked many times. The 3 best CPU coolers for the Intel i5 are the Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO, Noctua NH-D15 and Corsair H100i v2.
The new Intel i5 10600K CPU from Comet Lake is ideal for gamers.
However, it is critical to maintain the heat generated by a CPU to a minimum, otherwise performance may suffer.
If the CPU becomes too hot, it may be damaged until it is completely destroyed.
PC users are seeking for the best CPU cooler as many gamers and enthusiasts upgrade to the latest Intel Core i5 10600K CPU.
We examined three top CPU coolers that are compatible with and appropriate for the i5 10600K to assist you in your choice to purchase the best CPU cooler.
Every CPU cooler is evaluated not only on its performance, but also on its price-performance ratio.
Our final conclusion and suggestion in condensed form may be found at the bottom of the article or in the table on top.
Best CPU Coolers for the Intel i5-10600K (Test Results)
AORUS ATC800 RGB is ranked first.
- Both the fans and the cover have quite intricate lighting.
- Temperature and fan speed are shown on an integrated display.
- Two A-RGB push-pull fans are supplied, as well as a Y-adapter.
- Operation that is quiet
- There will be no other fans offered.
CPU with the best performance for the i5-10600K
For a long time, Gigabyte and its gaming label Aorus have been involved in the cooling market.
The huge and lighted Aorus logo on the ATC700 immediately drew notice at first sight.
The new ATC800 is significantly more noticeable now.
Gigabyte additionally glows not just the logo but also a multi-level display for temperature and number of revolutions, as well as the two fans.
Gigabytes RGB Fusion is in charge of the lighting.
A single-tower cooler from Aorus, the ATC800.
It comes pre-installed with two 120 mm fans that operate in a push-pull mode.
The cooler (together with the eye-catching RGB lighting system) should be well worth the money, according to Gigabyte.
The breadth of delivery is reasonable and free of surprises.
Instructions, mounting supplies, a tiny open-end wrench for tightening the mounting screws, and a syringe containing heat-conducting paste are all included in the Gigabyte package.
The true heat sink is difficult to perceive.
Under the harsh gaming-style plastic coverings, it virtually vanishes. The manufacturer has already pre-assembled the two 120 mm fans.
Between 600 and 2,000 rpm, the fans may be regulated using PWM (pulse width modulation).
On the test system, we were also able to utilize this speed range.
The fans, as well as the bezel, are fastened to the cooler.
Although the fan clamps are no longer visible, disassembly is more difficult.
It doesn’t even have a gigabyte option: The ATC800 is meant to be mounted on a wall with fans connected.
The fans are designed to be decoupled from the cooler by rubber buffers. Behind the fans, a standard cooling fin structure emerges.
The heat sink itself is fairly little.
Because there are fans on both sides, the Aorus ATC800 is obviously more large.
When the radiator is not lighted, the top cover is the focal point.
The shiny surface displays the Aorus logo as well as the temperature and fan speed meter displays.
The number of bars should reflect the fan speed, and the color should show the temperature.
The CPU is in direct touch with the six 6mm heatpipes.
They seem flat and with just little gaps in the contact surface area.
Spacer bolts are put into the backplate and two mounting bars are added to them for placement on Intel’s mainstream platform.
Only the screw sleeves on the mounting bridge on the cooler itself need to be tightened.
The fact that the ATC800’s cooler and fan should be one unit causes a difficulty here.
The screws can’t be tightened from above because of the fans, therefore they have to be tightened from the side.
However, in the instance, or at the very least by feel on the left side, this is unlikely.
As a result, the test mainboard was removed to make room for the cooler assembly.
No other cooler has prompted us to take this step in recent years.
The cooler is placed far enough away from the memory slots on the test platform that the RAM modules are essentially unrestricted in height.
Our test setup is designed to mimic a gaming system’s usual heat buildup.
As a result, Intel’s Core i7-4790K, a popular CPU for high-performance gaming machines, is utilised.
It is installed on an ASUS Z97-DELUXE motherboard (NFC & WLC).
The power supply and graphics card are passively cooled so that the subjective listening experience is not harmed.
The test system is housed in the NZXT H630.
The entire tower provides enough room for the most powerful CPU coolers while also allowing us to test bigger AiO water cooling systems.
The soundproofed H630 hasn’t been tuned for cooling performance to the exclusion of everything else, but it should provide a fair compromise between cooling performance and noise.
This design is comparable to the popular Fractal Design Define models, for example.
Noctua’s high-quality fans have replaced the two factory-fitted case fans.
PWM control is used to run the NF-A15 PWM front fan and the NF-A14 PWM rear panel fan at 1,000 rpm. Finally, for the case fans, a good balance between appropriate cooling performance and acceptable noise levels is reached, resulting in the most realistic test circumstances conceivable.
Heat accumulating in the case, as well as a too strong impact of the case fans, are both ruled out.
A VOLTCRAFT SL-400 sound level meter is used to measure the volume at a distance of 20 cm from the left side of the housing.
For this reason, the sound-insulated housing is opened and the housing fans are turned off.
The volume of the CPU fans or AiO cooling may be calculated without influence from other components in this manner.
The room temperature is standardized to 20 °C for temperature measurements, and the current variation is monitored using a VOLTCRAFT IR 800-200 infrared thermometer.
We begin the time measurement as soon as the stress test begins.
Per test run, each cooler must withstand 30 minutes of Prime95.
The intense Small FTT test, in particular, has begun.
The temperatures are tracked using the log function of the CoreTemp tool throughout the course of the full time, with the arithmetic average of the highest attainable temperature being transmitted to our graphs (minus a possible difference to the normalized room temperature).
The thermal compound is Arctics Evergreen MX-2. On the heatspreader, we use a WLP spatula to uniformly disperse it.
The following software was used:
- RC6 CoreTemp 1.0
- Version 26.6 of Prime95 x64 (build 3)
At a glance, these are the test scenarios:
- Passive-aggressive (only air cooler and if reasonably possible)
- Ventilation at 1,000 rpm is standard.
- Ventilation in series at maximum speed
- Ventilation at 600 rpm is a good starting point.
- Ventilation at 1,000 rpm is a good starting point.
All determined temperature values are presented visually in Celsius and analyzed as a consequence of the observations.
It’s unsurprising that at 2,000 rpm, the two 120 mm fans become quite noisy.
The Aorus ATC800, on the other hand, may be used in a pleasant manner.
The fans are just barely audible even at 1,000 rpm.
They can become whisper silent at the lowest potential speed of 600 rpm. We surpassed the meter’s limitations when we measured 30 dB(A).
In the following test scenario, we look at the cooler’s performance with the series fan(s) spinning at 1,000 rpm and at full speed.
The housing cover is removed for AiO-coolings cooling capacity testing since it decreases cooling capacity disproportionately.
The fact that Gigabyte uses six heatpipes with direct CPU contact takes its toll with Intel LGA 115x.
This is due to the fact that only the four inner heatpipes have appropriate contact with these little processors, while the two outer heatpipes are suspended in mid-air.
This is the sole explanation for why the Aorus ATC800 on the test platform performs so poorly in comparison to the other tower coolers in the field.
We had to make do with measurements using reference fans since Gigabyte doesn’t offer free fan replacement.
Conclusion: The best CPU for the i5-10600K.
The Aorus ATC800 creates a strong first impression.
With two pre-mounted fans and a gaming design, the single-tower cooler looks huge and promises outstanding performance.
The addressable RGB lighting on the fans and the lid is really impressive, putting most other RGB coolers to shame.
The display of temperature and RPM is very amazing.
However, disillusionment sets in during cooler installation, since not only is changing fans more difficult because the fans are fastened to the cooler.
Screws from both sides must be put in at the end of the cooler installation process.
When the mainboard is removed, this is only achievable in a partly comfortable manner.
With all other coolers including AiO coolers from the previous several years, we could do without this step.
Despite the push-pull arrangement, the ATC800 may therefore impress in operation with a pleasing low noise level in the lower speed range.
The cooler can reach its full potential since all six heatpipes make adequate contact with Intel’s standard CPUs.
Visually, it seems to be more simpler – which, depending on personal preference, may be a benefit. In this price range, an AiO cooler is also a viable option.
Overall, the ACT800 is the clear winner in our test, and we strongly suggest it as a CPU cooler for the i5-10600K.
Noctua NH-D15 chromax is ranked second.
- Processing is excellent.
- Excellent cooling performance with little noise
- A wide range of accessories is included, including a Y-cable, a low-noise adaptor, and a screwdriver.
- The best value-for-money
- In the (semi-)passive or low speed range, there is a little power reduction.
CPU with the best price-to-performance ratio for the i5-10600K
“Ultimate cooling performance with maximum operating smoothness” is the theory behind Noctua’s new flagship model, as it was with its predecessor, the NH-D14.
The NH-D15 was developed over a three-year period, according to the Austrian cooling expert.
Noctua wants to make sure that the NH-D15 can live up to the high expectations that have been put on the successor to such a popular cooler as the NH-D14.
The two new series production fans, two Noctua NF-A15 PWM, are even somewhat bigger than ordinary 140mm fans at 140x150mm, and are the NH-greatest D15’s and most visible innovation.
However, in addition to the new and bigger series fans, the heat sink has been enlarged from 140 to 150mm, and the distance between the heatpipes has been increased, all of which should result in even better cooling performance.
Furthermore, Noctua hasn’t forgotten about the sometimes overlooked, but crucial to many customers and users, problem of compatibility.
The NH-bottommost D15’s exterior cooling fins have been pushed back to allow it to be placed with up to 64mm height memory bars, at least when using a single fan.
Noctua continues to employ the SecuFirm2 mounting method, which is compatible with AMD’s AM3+, AM2+, FM1, FM2, and FM2+ sockets as well as Intel’s LGA 1150, 1155, 1156, and 2011 sockets.
It may also be utilized on sockets LGA 775 and LGA 1366 with the optional NM-I3 mounting kit.
If at all feasible, future sockets should likewise be supported.
Direct competition for the NH-D15 includes well-known air coolers and classics like the Noctua NH-D14 SE2011, Phantek’s PH-TC14PE, and the EKL Alpenföhn K2 – as well as a few all-in-one water coolers.
Normal tower coolers such as the Akasa Venom, Prolimatech Megahalems, Arctic Cooling Freezer i30, or Alpine Foehn Brocken 2 are also included in the comparative database.
It’s also worth noting that since the launching of the CPU cooler testing, our test database has progressively increased, and the test system has now found a home in the bigger and larger NZXT Phantom 820.
As a result, the new test system can accommodate a wide range of coolers, including bigger AiO water coolers up to 280 mm, making it much more future-proof.
As is customary, we’ll begin with the packing and some basic information on the Noctua NH-D15.
The package design is pretty similar to the previous one.
The Noctua NH-D15 is also packaged in a well-designed packaging that has all of the pertinent information regarding the cooler and its fans.
The accessories and packaging are kept in such a clean, efficient, and well-organized manner by Noctua.
All accessories that belong together are isolated from one another in compact boxes, eliminating the need to look for the proper or required pieces.
Assembling and preparing food becomes considerably simpler as a result of this.
Noctua’s website, as usual, has full information and all cooler specs.
The website has all of the information in a variety of languages.
It’s not simple to order one of the most popular and great air coolers when it comes to distinctive selling characteristics.
Noctua takes the seemingly correct approach here, attempting to improve on its predecessor’s performance within the confines of what is sensible, without losing sight of the problem of compatibility.
Apart from boosting performance and efficiency, as is customary with Noctua, operating at maximum smoothness remains one of the guiding principles of the company’s concept.
Two 150140 mm fans from Noctua’s own NF-A15 series with PWM connection are included as standard fans.
The fans’ breadth has therefore been enlarged from 140 to 150 mm, and they now operate at up to 1500 rpm (our models reached 1560 rpm), creating an airflow of up to 140.2 m3/h at a noise level of up to 24.6 dB, according to the manufacturer (A).
The two series fans are held in place by four enclosed mounting brackets with 105 mm hole spacing – this is the standard hole spacing for 120 mm fans, therefore alternative 120 mm or 140 mm fans with 105 mm hole spacing may be used similarly.
Noctua’s well-known SecuFirm2 mounting kit for Intel and AMD systems, two low-noise adapters, a Y-cable that allows the two fans to be controlled together, said clips for mounting the fan, and a small tube of Noctua’s well-known heat-conducting paste Noctua NT-H1 are also included in the scope of delivery.
Our reference thermal compound – see test system – is, of course, utilized in this test to guarantee that all coolers are comparable.
Out of regard for overseas consumers, the assembly instructions are only provided in printed form in English.
The Noctua NH-D15 is a twin-tower cooler with a 10 mm broader cooling surface than its predecessor.
Both installed fans will undoubtedly clash with any protruding RAM heatsinks, measuring 15.0 cm (W) x 16.5 cm (H) x 16.1 cm (D).
But we’ll get to it later. However, the 16.5-centimeter height isn’t too projecting and shouldn’t cause compatibility issues with standard-sized towers.
As is typically the case, measuring up ahead of time or being clear on the spatial circumstances in your own tower should be really beneficial.
The cooler’s base plate, or contact surface with the CPU, is nickel-plated and has a flat – rather than convex – form.
Convex base plates are hotly debated because they allow for a greater contact pressure on the CPU, which in certain cases allows for better cooling performance (depending on the shape and variant of the heatspreader of the specific CPU).
The NH-D15, like its predecessor, features six symmetrically organized six-millimetre heat pipes that span the length of the cooler’s radiator surface.
These heatpipes, in contrast to its predecessor, are significantly wider apart, which should improve the widely-lauded efficiency of its predecessor even more.
All heatpipes are nicely merged into the cooler’s bottom — there’s no need to be critical here, as there was with the predecessor.
The bottom of the cooler has also been nickel-plated neatly, with no dirt or unevenness visible.
The radiator is made up of 45 aluminium fins with a 2 mm internal spacing (or 44 without the top finish).
The heat sink has been tuned for operation with high-efficiency fans, and can most likely only develop its strengths with such fans, as seen by the rather narrow fin spacing.
The seven bottommost fins are visibly indented to the rear of the 45 fins, allowing some upward room for Ram kits with bigger coolers and therefore greatly increasing compatibility with different OC kits.
Naturally, the Noctua NH-D15 can only run with one fan, and the front fan is not included.
In addition, the heatsink contains four slots in which the clips for attaching the fans may be snapped into, providing for a secure and simple fan installation.
The heatsink’s fins have been thoroughly deburred, and no extremely sharp edges or corners were discovered in the test, posing a risk of injury to the user.
The predecessor, the NH-D14, was criticized for its harsh edges on occasion.
We couldn’t identify any manufacturing flaws in our sample, and the cooler’s manufacturing quality is great.
The cooler’s construction is almost similar to that of its predecessor, can be completed in a matter of minutes by expert hands, and is quite comfortable.
We were able to install the cooler without first removing the mainboard from the casing.
If the case has a sufficiently sized cutout on the rear of the mainboard tray, it should also be able to install the cooler on other Intel or AMD systems without removing the mainboard.
The four provided bolts are screwed to the base’s threads first, then the two mounting bridges are put on top of them and attached with two huge thumbscrews in the appropriate mounting direction.
The cooler is then lowered into the case from the top and positioned such that it “docks” on these mounting bridges.
Then it’s simply screwed in from top via the gap created by the missing 140 mm fan (which can only be fastened afterwards).
The cross brace, which is fastened to the mounting bridges, is especially commendable in that it is securely linked to the heat sink and so cannot move, making installation considerably simpler and more comfortable.
This should be used as an example by the competition.
Dimensions and perception of volume
The two Noctua NF-A15 PWMs, which are serial fans on the Noctua NH-D15, provide a good first impression.
They are really pleasing in both the 600 rpm and 1000 rpm test scenarios, and only stand out in the latter with a tiny, but not distracting noise.
Although the functioning at maximum speed, which in our tests was about 1560 rpm, is much louder, the noise level at these rates was just about tolerable.
The operation at 600 revolutions per minute, as well as the operation at 1000 revolutions per minute, are therefore suited for users who are very sensitive to noise.
Without sealed off headphones, the background noise in the test scenario at maximum rpm was already uncomfortable and disrupted immersion into the game world.
The Noctua NH-D15 also ranks among the best performers on the test field in the findings of our VOLTCRAFT SL-200 sound level meter, with a measured noise level of 34.8 dB(A).
Our subjective hearing perceptions seem to be confirmed by the quantitative findings at 1000 rpm.
The NH-D15 settles on a spot in the middle, now audible but not yet annoying.
The NH-D15 gets to work at full fan speed (1560 rpm in our tests) and returns to the middle.
However, given the two fans and rather high speeds, this placement may be seen as fairly favorable.
The Noctua NH-D15 is a respectable but somewhat more costly successor to one of the most popular and well-known air coolers, the Noctua NH-D14, at little under 90 dollars.
Rather of fully discarding the predecessor’s successful design, the NH-D15 incorporates a number of minor enhancements and tweaks to increase compatibility, according to the tagline “evolution rather than revolution.”
The radiator’s lowest seven cooling fins, for example, have been reduced or relocated to the rear to provide maximum compatibility with high-height ram kits when the front fan is turned off.
The heatsink was also enlarged by 10 millimeters, apparently to make up for the lost cooling area.
In addition, the distance between the heatpipes has been slightly increased, allowing for even more effective heat dissipation to the radiator.
There have been significant changes among the series’ fanbase, in the fullest sense of the term.
Noctua’s NH-D15 is the first to incorporate two strong and powerful series fans in the box, with the two NF-A15 PWM fans, which are even slightly bigger at 150140 mm.
The heatsink and series fans were exactly matched in our experiments with reference fans — performance reduced marginally compared to the predecessor while using reference fans.
However, this is unlikely to be seen as a flaw, since few consumers would choose to replace the supplied series fans with smaller, less powerful fans.
Further flaws were not discovered throughout the testing; both the heat sink and the many attachments are well-made and have never given reason for complaint.
Conclusion: For the i5-10600K, the CPU with the best price-performance ratio is the Intel Core i5-10600K.
The NH-D15 was able to establish itself at the top of the test field in most of our scenarios, leaving most of its immediate rivals – even some water-cooling systems with smaller radiators – in the dust.
Only in the (semi-)passive test scenarios and the test scenario with gently moving fans did the NH-D15 fail to fully immerse itself in the spotlight – while maintaining a strong presence in the higher reaches of the test field.
As a result, the NH-D15 can be recommended without reservation to anybody searching for an uncompromising premium cooler that is not only powerful but also quiet.
The Noctua NH-D15 earns our coveted Great Hardware Award for its well-rounded packaging, plentiful accessories, and excellent cooling performance at a very low noise level.
The NH-D15 receives the best price-performance ratio award for CPU cooling for the i5-10600K because of its low price.
Third place: be silent! 4 Dark Rock
- Excellent cooling capacity
- Processing of high grade
- Fan that is really silent
- RAM compatibility is limited.
For the i5-10600K, a high-performance CPU is required.
Be silent with Dark Rock 4! uses the well-known dark rock cooler recipe: a black cooling tower with aluminum fins meets a nickel-plated copper plate.
The design incorporates a silent wings fan, which is designed to ensure quiet operation. Iteration 4 is touted to be superior than its predecessor Dark Rock 3:
The tower cooler is expected to cool marginally better than its predecessor at the same noise level by redesigning the “inner workings,” i.e. the heat pipes and the black coating of the cooling tower.
As a consequence, the TDP is 200 watts instead of 190 watts.
A further innovation is the mounting method, which, according to be silent!, is now more user-friendly.
Apart from these two features, the manufacturer is skimping on future improvements – further distinctions between Dark Rock 3 and 4 must be scrutinized with a magnifying glass, as the coolers are almost identical.
It still has six heatpipes, the top finish of the final fin is the same, and the cooling tower is still in the middle: Dark Rock is still forbidden an asymmetrical layout for greater compatibility with large RAM modules in the fourth generation.
The Dark Rock 4 must demonstrate on the AM4 test system that it maintains the manufacturer’s claims throughout the test.
However, as be quiet!, a straight comparison with the predecessor Dark Rock 3 is not feasible. I was unable to submit a sample of the older cooler to the editing crew.
Instead, Dark Rock 4 must contend with the Thermalright HR-02 Macho (Test) and Scythe Mugen 5 tower coolers (Test).
Please keep your voice down! Dark Rock 4 is described in full.
Please keep your voice down! The Dark Rock 4 is a traditional tower cooler.
A copper base plate transmits the CPU’s waste heat to six heat pipes, which then transport it to an aluminum fin radiator.
Finally, an axial fan ventilates the cooling tower, allowing the heat to escape into the atmosphere.
The cooling tower and the base plate are made to a high standard.
Be silent for the sake of appearances! employs a black coating over the whole cooler – with the exception of the base plate, which is nickel-plated – and gives the cooler the black end fin familiar from the Dark Rock series.
For ventilation, a quiet wings fan is utilized, with technical specifications matching those of the Dark Rock 3: The fan, which measures 135 135 22 mm in diameter, spins at a maximum of 1,400 rpm.
It makes use of an FDB bearing as well as the manufacturer’s regular drill holes, which are relocated to the frame’s center in a unique fashion.
The breadth of distribution is comparable to a high-end CPU cooler’s liberal standard:
All contemporary CPU sockets are covered, with the exception of AMD TR4, and an extra set of fan clamps is supplied for installing a second quiet wings fan:
The wire brackets are incompatible with standard fans.
Thermal paste is provided in a resealable syringe, and mounting instructions are written in multiple languages.
A screwdriver has also been considered by the manufacturer for assembly.
The Silent Wings fan, on the other hand, looks to be a nasty beast in test mode: PWM control achieves no decently linear speed response when used with the Aquaero 6 LT (Test) fan control.
Instead, the fan comes to a halt at 50 percent PWM power, barely reaches 900 rpm at 99 percent, and then accelerates to over 1350 rpm at 100 percent. With PWM control, the MSI X370 XPower Gaming Titanium delivers the required speed curve.
Almost everyone disregards the norm.
This is due to the PWM implementation of the fan, which does not quite meet the standards published by Intel, according to Aqua Computer.
Because the typical mainboard also does not adhere to Intel’s PWM standard, this issue will be difficult to duplicate.
The mentioned behavior can only be achieved by combining the fan with a controller that appropriately implements the PWM standard.
The fan’s bearing is consistent along the line.
The fan works silently at first, with a beginning speed of about 200 rpm, until inevitable air sounds emerge at higher speeds.
The reason that the fan is quieter than conventional 140 mm fans at the same speed is due, at least in part, to its shallower depth: the Silent Wings fan is just 22 mm deep instead of the standard 25 mm, resulting in less air being transported at the same speed.
In the test system, assemble
Please keep your voice down! expressly promotes the Dark Rock 4’s improved mounting method, which is much more user-friendly than its predecessor.
Be quiet throughout practice! Thermalright, for example, has been utilizing the HR-02 Macho Rev. B (Test) for four years and has therefore arrived at the following stand:
Mounting brackets connect the backplate to the front of the mainboard.
The cooler is then put on the CPU and attached to the mounting brackets via a mounting bar from above.
The system functions well and does not cause any significant issues for the user.
However, Scythe’s current competition demonstrates that it may be even simpler:
The CPU cooler’s mounting bracket, as well as the screws, are already pre-installed with Scythe Mugen 5 (Test) – this ensures that these pieces do not separate from the whole design during installation, making fitting the cooler even simpler.
When placed on an AM4, the Dark Rock 4 cannot be rotated in 90° increments, which is a major flaw:
Only the RAM slots would be hidden due to the projecting cooling tower.
RAM versus cooler
The non-staggered cooling tower in Dark Rock 4 has one main flaw:
While it is now standard industry practice, even with modest tower coolers (test), to adjust the radiator such that the first RAM slot is a comfortable distance away, be quiet! This development is ignored.
The Dark Rock 4 is positioned above the CPU in such a way that the first RAM slot is fully covered by the fan.
Even the second slot would be impacted if a conventional model with a 25 mm frame depth was used instead of the small 22 mm fan.
Moving the cooler’s fan higher may help address the issue to some degree.
The ComputerBase test system’s almost 4 cm high G.Skill FlareX modules fit beneath the fan with slight force:
Even after the fan has been adjusted as far as it can upwards, the fan still pushes softly on the memory bar’s heatspreader.
As a result, memory with even larger heat sinks will not fit in a fully loaded machine under any circumstances.
For years, the rival has been doing this better with staggered cooling towers.
When moving the fan higher, keep in mind that the cooler’s total height climbs to almost 16.5 cm.
As a result, the casing must provide sufficient room for CPU cooling.
Conclusion: The i5-10600K has a well functioning CPU.
To summarize, be silent! Please keep your voice down! Dark Rock 4 is a high-end tower cooler with a whisper-quiet fan and excellent cooling performance at an affordable price.
However, very little has changed in contrast to its predecessor — primarily, the mounting method has been modified, allowing the competitors to finally catch up at this point.
For some rivals, though, attaching a CPU cooler is still a little more pleasurable.
Dark Rock 4’s low RAM compatibility is still a valid topic of contention.
Because the fan is positioned above the first RAM slot, a complete arrangement is only achievable with low memory bars.
Please keep your voice down! This constraint may have been overcome (as is common with big tower coolers) by shifting the cooling tower, however this was not the case.
This compensates for the exceptionally quiet fan, since the quality “silent” is now challenged by a CPU cooler that is abnormally incompatible.
Overall, the Dark Rock 4 is a capable CPU cooler for the Core i5-10600K.
Conclusion: The Best CPU Coolers for Intel’s i5-10600K
Overall, the final choice in this exam is rather straightforward.
If you’re a serious gamer who cares about the appearance of your gaming rig, the Aorus ATC800 is a must-have.
It has incredible performance for the i5-10600K.
This kind of CPU cooling will appeal to gamers and power users in particular. The Aorus ATC800 is also not that much more costly than the other CPU coolers we reviewed.
You should acquire the Noctua NH-D15 if you want the greatest price-performance ratio CPU to go with the i5-10600K.
It provides excellent performance at a cheaper cost than the Aorus ACT800, but with somewhat lesser performance.
You can acquire the be silent! if you are truly price conscious and don’t care about performance. 4. Dark Rock
However, we would suggest at least the Noctua to everyone else, since it offers much better performance for a very little increase in price.
The “best cpu cooler for overclocking” is a question that many people ask. The 3 best CPU coolers for the Intel i5 are the Noctua NH-D15, the Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO and the Thermaltake Riing Plus 12 LED.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does an i5 need a CPU cooler?
A: The i5 has a thermal design power of 65 watts, which is the amount of heat it dissipates. It does not need an external CPU cooler because it can keep cool with its built-in heatsink and fan.
What is the best CPU cooler for Intel?
A: The best CPU cooler for Intel is the Noctua NH-D15.
What CPU cooler should I get for i5 10600k?
A: You should probably choose a CPU cooler that has screw holes, as there are no screws on the back of your i5. For example, Noctuas NH-D15 is an inexpensive and highly reliable choice for such a processor.
Related Tags
- best cpu liquid cooler
- cooler master hyper 212
- best cpu liquid cooler 2021
- best cpu cooler 2021
- best budget cpu cooler